白泽(Whitzard)女娲实验室 ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

搜索 NUWA Index

研究 · 测量协议 · 评测结果 · 观点

English
← NUWA Index

来源档案

Evaluation of DeepSeek AI Models

对 CAISI · DeepSeek models 的逐来源提取与核查,发现和数值均保留原始归属。

原始来源与出处 ↓ · 评估档案 →

范围与归属

数据报告方
NIST / CAISI
实际评测方
各观测的执行方未完整确定
抓取版本
2026-10-26
来源身份
23f49288b6f55815

来源转录不等于实验复现。未确定的日期、执行方及配置保留为未知;原文分组不作为经核验排名。

来源发现

以下陈述整理自原始来源,未作为 NUWA 独立实验结论。

CAISI 于 2025 年 9 月开展评测。评测机构是 NIST 下属 CAISI,DeepSeek、OpenAI 和 Anthropic 是模型开发者。

pp. 2, 4-5

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

CAISI 从 Hugging Face 下载 DeepSeek 权重并在自有云服务器托管;参考模型通过云端 API 调用,成本比较使用 DeepSeek 公布的 API 价格。

p. 5

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

网络能力结果是受限沙箱任务的完成率;劫持评测关注是否尝试执行注入指令;越狱评测关注回应的服从程度与细节。这些测量对象不同。

pp. 24-30, 46, 50

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

CAISI 使用定制 CVE-Bench 子集,将 Cybench 改造为 Inspect 与自有智能体架构,并把 pwn.college 挑战转换为评测任务;结果不能与原协议直接互换。

pp. 25, 27, 29

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

在已评测模型、设置和任务范围内,CAISI 报告 DeepSeek 智能体基准表现落后于领先参考模型,同时 V3.1 相比早期 R1 有所改善。

pp. 6, 8-10, 24, 31

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

报告采用广义线性混合模型与混合效应逻辑回归,并用 delta 方法估计误差,没有将这些分数称为 IRT 估计。不能据此反推成功次数。

Appendix A3, pp. 64-65

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

HealthBench 使用医生评分细则的加权分数与 GPT-4.1 判别器;汇总表笼统的“任务解决百分比”表述不能替代该评分定义。

pp. 34, 38

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

劫持研究使用固定的公开与非公开注入,而非针对本批模型自适应红队。未遇到注入文本的样本被排除,尝试恶意行动即计入,行动是否成功另作区分。

p. 46

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

非生物类恶意请求评测衡量回应的服从与细节;细节分不衡量正确性或实际效用。报告使用三个判别模型的众数,并以人工标注检查一致性。

p. 50

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

叙事一致性基准使用美国国务院专家选择的标记与模型评分;结果依赖于所选叙事集,未来版本可能不可直接比较。

pp. 53-55

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

采用率数据只是部分平台的代理指标。衍生模型上传量不能证明原模型或全部衍生模型的性能与安全性质。

pp. 23, 56-60

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

报告声明结果是初步、局部且依赖版本与时间的评估,不构成认证或背书。

p. 61

结论范围限于原始来源的任务与实验条件;原文定位保留供核查。

提取范围

以下条目说明来源各部分的处理状态。个别观测已核验,不代表整份文档的全部结论和结果均已验证。

查看 105 项覆盖记录
章节处理状态定位与范围
Executive Summaryqualitativep. 2Non-CBRN summary claims retained; cross-domain misuse percentages omitted because harmful biology is included.
Methodologyextractedpp. 4-5Independent CAISI evaluation; self-hosted DeepSeek vs cloud APIs for references; model identity and deployment caveats retained.
Overview of Findingsqualitativep. 6Overview maps to detailed sections; no additional independent experiment.
Performance Evaluations Overviewextractedpp. 7-13All Table 3.1 cells retained; rounded narrative duplicates not duplicated as independent evidence.
Cost Efficiency Analysis Overviewextractedpp. 14-15Aggregate and price/context caveats retained; CI figure has no numeric endpoints.
Security Evaluations Overviewqualitativepp. 16-20Narrow assessment; does not test sleeper triggers; self-hosted deployment caveat.
Agent Hijackingextractedpp. 16-17Nine printed prose percentages retained; no bar height estimation.
Jailbreakingqualitativepp. 18-20CBRN limited to metadata/high-level caveats; exact non-biological prose outputs retained separately.
CCP Censorship Overviewqualitativep. 21Source interpretation attributed; exact detailed Table 7.5 retained instead of rounded summary numbers.
Model Adoption Overviewextractedpp. 22-23Printed platform/time-window statistics retained; detailed section supplies repeated values.
Performance Evaluationsextractedpp. 24-41All four numeric tables and task-set methods retained.
Cyberextractedpp. 24-30Whole-task agentic success metrics; no task/exploit instructions copied.
CVE-Benchextractedpp. 25-26Custom 15-task set: seven public and eight private; pass/fail objectives; not original public benchmark configuration.
Cybenchextractedpp. 27-2840 challenges; CAISI Inspect/agent architecture; missing original competition files restored.
CTF-Archiveextractedpp. 29-30577 challenges from 79 competitions (2011-2025); CAISI conversion; category chart figure-only.
Software Developmentextractedpp. 31-34Table 4.8 all cells retained.
SWE-bench Verifiedextractedpp. 31-32489 problems from 12 repositories; excluded 11 original problems as Anthropic did; success requires all tests.
Breakpointextractedpp. 33-34200-task subset; code-corruption framework; success requires all tests.
Science and Knowledgeextractedpp. 34-39Table 4.13 all cells retained, source internal conflicts quarantined.
MMLU-Proextractedp. 35Same 1,000 randomly sampled science-discipline questions for all models; not full 12,032-question benchmark.
MMMLUextractedp. 36Same 1,400 questions: 100 per 14 languages; all disciplines.
GPQAextractedp. 37GPQA-Diamond 198 questions; general knowledge score only; no biological task details.
HealthBenchextractedp. 385,000 conversations; 48,562 rubric criteria; GPT-4.1 grader; rubric score cannot be treated as binary solves.
Humanity’s Last Examextractedp. 392,158 text-only questions, not full 2,500 question/multimodal dataset.
Mathematical Reasoningextractedpp. 40-41Table 4.19 all cells retained; o4-mini equivalence grader.
Recent mathematics competitionsextractedpp. 40-41SMT 58; OTIS-AIME 30; PUMaC 55 text-only tasks.
Cost Efficiency Analysisextractedpp. 42-44All Table 5.3 cells; curves not digitized; geometric expense ratios over overlapping achievable performance range.
Security Evaluationsqualitativepp. 45-52Hijacking vs refusal/detail scoring separated; not complete security assessment.
Agent Hijackingextractedpp. 45-4830 benign tasks x five samples x two fixed injections, three malicious task classes; attempted actions conditional on injection exposure; default AgentDojo enhanced by CAISI.
Jailbreakingqualitativepp. 48-52Harmful biology/violence dataset: methodological metadata only; no dangerous capability comparisons or task content. Non-biological 30 hacking +50 scam queries; 17 public attacks, separate selection and evaluation sets; three graders. No operational prompts copied.
Censorship Evaluationsextractedpp. 53-55190 free responses; narrative-flag rubric and LLM judge; all Table 7.5 cells. Tables 7.1-7.3 illustrative methodology only.
Model Adoptionextractedpp. 56-60All exact printed prose statistics retained; charts not digitized.
Model Downloadsextractedpp. 56-57Hugging Face/ModelScope publicly archived counts; downloads do not equal users.
Model Usage via APIextractedpp. 57-59OpenRouter family/variant aggregation and limited platform coverage retained.
Derivative Model Uploadsextractedpp. 59-60Exact prose relative bound retained; plot points figure-only; modification does not establish original model risk/performance.
Disclaimerqualitativep. 61Preliminary, partial, time/version-specific; benchmark contamination and generalization caveats; no certification or endorsement.
Agent Designextractedpp. 62-63CAISI ReAct; tool formats optimized model-by-model; same benchmark environment and tools across models.
Agent Resource Budgetextractedpp. 63-64500,000 weighted tokens: output 100%, unique input 23%, total input 2%; not raw output token ceiling.
Uncertainty Estimationextractedpp. 64-65Mixed-effects logistic regression, model fixed effects/task random effects; delta-method SE. Not labelled IRT; no raw per-cell counts inferred.
Model Parametersextractedp. 65Model-specific agentic/nonagentic modes captured; DeepSeek temperature 0.6/top_p 0.95; Opus agentic temperature 0.7.
Model Token Pricesextractedp. 66All six Table A5.1 values; historical authoring-time quote.
Cost Ratio Calculationextractedpp. 66-67Expense curves estimated from transcripts; truncated at alternate budget trigger; geometric mean over common achievable performance interval.
Selection of Benchmarksqualitativepp. 67-68Lower-contamination/real-world relevance rationale; multimodal inputs excluded; metadata only for CBRN.
Comparison to Self-Reported Benchmark Scoresreusedpp. 68-69All nonblank cells retained; Self columns explicitly reused developer results; no origin revalidation; blank cells not zero.
Table 3.1: Capability overviewextractedp. 7All printed nonblank numeric cells retained; duplicated results identified as such.
Table 4.1: Cyber performanceextractedp. 24All printed nonblank numeric cells retained; duplicated results identified as such.
Table 4.8: Software performanceextractedp. 31All printed nonblank numeric cells retained; duplicated results identified as such.
Table 4.13: Science and knowledge performanceextractedp. 34All printed nonblank numeric cells retained; duplicated results identified as such.
Table 4.19: Mathematics performanceextractedp. 40All printed nonblank numeric cells retained; duplicated results identified as such.
Table 5.3: Performance and cost ratiosextractedp. 44All printed nonblank numeric cells retained; duplicated results identified as such.
Table 7.5: Narrative alignmentextractedp. 55All printed nonblank numeric cells retained; duplicated results identified as such.
Table A5.1: Token pricesextractedp. 66All printed nonblank numeric cells retained; duplicated results identified as such.
Table A8.1: CAISI/self comparisonreusedp. 69All printed nonblank numeric cells retained; duplicated results identified as such.
Table 7.1: Example bilingual questionsqualitativep. 53Illustrative method, not a measured model score; no synthetic example promoted to an observation.
Table 7.2: Example narrative flagsqualitativep. 53Illustrative method, not a measured model score; no synthetic example promoted to an observation.
Table 7.3: Worked narrative alignment illustrationqualitativep. 54Illustrative method, not a measured model score; no synthetic example promoted to an observation.
Figure 3.2figure-onlyp. 8No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 3.3figure-onlyp. 10No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 3.4figure-onlyp. 11No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 3.5figure-onlyp. 13No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 3.6figure-onlyp. 14No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 3.7figure-onlyp. 17No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 3.8qualitativep. 19CBRN: method metadata and high-level limitations only; numerical dangerous-capability comparisons omitted.
Figure 3.9qualitativep. 19CBRN: method metadata and high-level limitations only; numerical dangerous-capability comparisons omitted.
Figure 3.10figure-onlyp. 19No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 3.11figure-onlyp. 20No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 3.12figure-onlyp. 21No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 3.13figure-onlyp. 22No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.2figure-onlyp. 24No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.3figure-onlyp. 26No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.4figure-onlyp. 26No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.5figure-onlyp. 28No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.6figure-onlyp. 28No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.7figure-onlyp. 30No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.9figure-onlyp. 32No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.10figure-onlyp. 32No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.11figure-onlyp. 33No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.12figure-onlyp. 34No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.14figure-onlyp. 35No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.15figure-onlyp. 36No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.16figure-onlyp. 37No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.17figure-onlyp. 38No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.18figure-onlyp. 39No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.20figure-onlyp. 40No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.21figure-onlyp. 41No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 4.22figure-onlyp. 41No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 5.1figure-onlyp. 42No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 5.2figure-onlyp. 43No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 6.1figure-onlyp. 45No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 6.2figure-onlyp. 47No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 6.3figure-onlyp. 48No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 6.4figure-onlyp. 49No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 6.5figure-onlyp. 49No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 6.6qualitativep. 51CBRN: method metadata and high-level limitations only; numerical dangerous-capability comparisons omitted.
Figure 6.7qualitativep. 51CBRN: method metadata and high-level limitations only; numerical dangerous-capability comparisons omitted.
Figure 6.8figure-onlyp. 52No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 6.9figure-onlyp. 52No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 7.4figure-onlyp. 55No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 8.1figure-onlyp. 56No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 8.2figure-onlyp. 57No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 8.3figure-onlyp. 58No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 8.4figure-onlyp. 59No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 8.5figure-onlyp. 59No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure 8.6figure-onlyp. 60No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.
Figure A1.1figure-onlyp. 62No bar or curve heights estimated; exact values extracted only where printed in accompanying tables or prose.

来源待核实事项

本报告使用 CVE-Bench、Cybench 和 CTF-Archive,未评测 CyberGym。Cybench 的实际方法位于 §4.1.2。

报告同时描述经验平均与混合效应估计;任务总数不能直接用来反推表中分数的成功次数。

版本指纹
document

https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf

0577019513c6636753deb7818f0af7e4534a68217bb1c45b9baaed0759b01ecc
document

https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2025/09/caisi-evaluation-deepseek-ai-models-finds-shortcomings-and-risks

615269ccc21748ab4e6d24972adb4baa2a666c1a858d8fac5b4f7129ac48f58d
renderer

https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf

00fc244f57cc82601b2f7ff65ac22a3f7d6c9d63c2e362643655b7c026da6f36
renderer

https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf

fd4eb9d01d18939a7cde29305bd6060efabde5edda633ab8a09336dae4957505
renderer

https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf

f296506e26546871af08020316ab7abcd2cf01bab25c1d7e1c2dd502a139851a
data

https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf

4b267893d3c4b6b48d36deb99efec591c414d2e2608be0625d90b477298c82af

参考文献

  1. [1] Evaluation of DeepSeek AI Models. 2025-09-30. 30 September 2025