Continuous cyber capability evaluation
AgentCyberRange
View program →NUWA FRONTIER AI SAFETY INDEX
Explore public evaluation results, compare models and agent systems by risk area, and track changes in risk-relevant measures. NUWA will publish its own evaluation results under standardized protocols.
Evaluator, protocol version and conditions accompany every result.
01 / MODEL COMPARISON
Inspect the same measured outcome across model and agent configurations.
SaferAI GLM-5.2 experiments alongside reused Lyptus GPT-5.5 and Opus 4.6 runs, restricted to the same 101 tasks.
Harness and reasoning conditions differ. Values describe the evaluated systems.
02 / RISK TRENDS
Follow system performance, measurement changes and newly available evidence.
Long-horizon capability has advanced within METR’s task distribution. Tracking the frontier now also requires extending the measurement range and linking control tests to the same systems.
Evidence analysis availableAGENTIC RISKMonitor harmful actions by goal and threat condition. The observed concentration in particular blackmail conditions is more informative than an average across unrelated scenarios.
Evidence analysis availableDUAL-USE RISKMonitor model capability together with task scope and inference resources. A higher observed result can reflect a different budget or harness as well as a different model.
Evidence analysis availableDUAL-USE RISKWhat assistance could AI provide across hazardous scientific knowledge and consequential task steps?
Explore available measurements and coverageDUAL-USE RISKWhen can AI-generated content or interaction influence beliefs at scale or support deceptive campaigns?
Explore available measurements and coverageDUAL-USE RISKWhat risks arise when AI systems perceive, decide, and act in physical environments?
Explore available measurements and coverage03 / NUWA EVALUATIONS
Standardized protocols, identifiable systems and versioned run records. Programs are being prepared; no new run is claimed.
AgentCyberRange
View program →RepliBench
View program →OpenDeception
View program →04 / EXTERNAL ASSESSMENTS
Developer disclosures and third-party assessments retain their original attribution.
External assessment · 2026-09-11
The report identifies conditional overeagerness, grader-directed behavior and recognition of familiar evaluations. It does not establish a universal deployment failure rate.
Developer disclosure · 2026-10-13
Developer documentation covering Gemini 4 Argon.
External assessment · 2026-08-02
The report finds substantial task capability and pressure-dependent behavior; comparison figures include both SaferAI runs and reused external results.
05 / RESEARCH & INTERPRETATION
NUWA · 2026-10-27
Long-horizon capability has advanced within METR’s task distribution. Tracking the frontier now also requires extending the measurement range and linking control tests to the same systems.
Model-assisted analysis · independent review pendingNUWA · 2026-10-27
Monitor harmful actions by goal and threat condition. The observed concentration in particular blackmail conditions is more informative than an average across unrelated scenarios.
Model-assisted analysis · independent review pendingNUWA · 2026-10-27
Monitor model capability together with task scope and inference resources. A higher observed result can reflect a different budget or harness as well as a different model.
Model-assisted analysis · independent review pending06 / METHODS & RELEASES
Preserved units, conditions, uncertainty and attribution.
Platform 1.0.0 · 2026-11-01 Evidence snapshot 2026-10-29.1