WhitzardNUWA Lab ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

Search NUWA Index

Research · Benchmarks · Findings · Perspectives

中文
← Assessments and reports

DEVELOPER DISCLOSURE · Meta

Muse Spark 1.1 Evaluation Report

Developer documentation covering Muse Spark 1.1.

Published 2026-07-09

Sources ↓

Developer-authored disclosure. Selected source sections were read; numerical results and comparability have not been audited. NUWA has not independently replicated these experiments.

Models covered

capability · PDF §§2.1–2.3

Cybench

Protocol record →

Task completion on 40 professional CTF problems.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

capability · PDF §§2.1–2.3

CyberGym

Protocol record →

Validated reproduction across a corpus of historical vulnerabilities.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

capability · PDF §§2.1–2.3

ExploitGym

Protocol record →

Evaluates exploit construction across real software targets and checks whether success uses the designated vulnerability.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

capability · PDF §§2.1–2.3

SHADE-Arena

Protocol record →

Covert side-task completion and monitor detection under defined tool access.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

propensity · PDF §§2.1–2.3

MASK

Protocol record →

Condition-bounded frequency of lying under stated pressures.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

behavior · PDF §3

FORTRESS

Protocol record →

Evaluates safeguards on national-security and public-safety tasks, separating hazardous requests from benign-use utility.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

behavior · PDF §3

AgentDojo

Protocol record →

Targeted attack success and user-task utility in a tool-use environment.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

propensity · PDF §4

DeceptionBench

Protocol record →

Evaluates 150 authored scenarios across five social domains, including neutral, incentive and pressure conditions.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

propensity · PDF §4

Agentic Misalignment

Protocol record →

Conditional rates and observed actions in controlled simulations.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

Report coverage

SectionSource locationTreatment
2 Preparedness AssessmentPDF §§2.1–2.3Linked protocol

API agentic affordances expand the assessment context. Developer cannot rule out high pre-mitigation cyber and biochemical capability; residual-risk judgment includes safeguards.

3 Adversarial RobustnessPDF §3Linked protocol

Direct misuse, prompt injection and false refusals are evaluated separately.

4 Model BehaviorPDF §4Linked protocol

Honesty, risk escalation, evaluation awareness and automated alignment audits are distinct behavior constructs; artificial scenario results have limited deployment generality.

References

  1. [1] Muse Spark 1.1 Evaluation Report. 2026-07-09