WhitzardNUWA Lab ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

Search NUWA Index

Research · Benchmarks · Findings · Perspectives

中文
← Assessments and reports

DEVELOPER DISCLOSURE · Meta

Muse Spark Safety & Preparedness Report

Developer documentation covering Muse Spark.

Published 2026-05-14 · Updated 2026-08-24

Sources ↓

Developer-authored disclosure. Selected source sections were read; numerical results and comparability have not been audited. NUWA has not independently replicated these experiments.

Models covered

capability · https://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S2.SS2

Cybench

Protocol record →

Task completion on 40 professional CTF problems.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

capability · https://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S2.SS2

CyberGym

Protocol record →

Validated reproduction across a corpus of historical vulnerabilities.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

propensity · https://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S2.SS3

MASK

Protocol record →

Condition-bounded frequency of lying under stated pressures.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

propensity · https://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S2.SS3

Agentic Misalignment

Protocol record →

Conditional rates and observed actions in controlled simulations.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

behavior · https://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S3.SS2

AgentDojo

Protocol record →

Targeted attack success and user-task utility in a tool-use environment.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

propensity · https://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S4.SS1.SSS5

DeceptionBench

Protocol record →

Evaluates 150 authored scenarios across five social domains, including neutral, incentive and pressure conditions.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

propensity · https://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S4.SS1.SSS11

Alignment Faking

Protocol record →

Condition-dependent response differences and reported traces.

A protocol mention does not establish cross-report comparability or independent replication.

This section is catalogued; no precise numerical result has been extracted here. Open the original report for its figures and full findings.

Report coverage

SectionSource locationTreatment
2.1 Chemical & Biological Riskshttps://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S2.SS1Contextual evidence

Developer separates high pre-mitigation capability from residual risk of the Meta AI deployment; no numerical biology results or task content extracted.

2.2 Cybersecurityhttps://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S2.SS2Linked protocol

Covers knowledge, agentic capability, refusals and insecure-code propensity; public and private tasks have different limits.

2.3 Loss of Controlhttps://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S2.SS3Linked protocol

Assessment integrates evaluation reliability, monitorability and propensities; future-facing agentic tests exceed the initial Meta AI deployment context.

3.2 Agent Robustnesshttps://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S3.SS2Linked protocol

Indirect prompt injection tests use benign users and realistic scaffolds; residual attack susceptibility remains.

4.1.5 Honestyhttps://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S4.SS1.SSS5Linked protocol

Distinguishes known-belief dishonesty from hallucination and third-party deceptive assistance.

4.1.10 Scheming and 4.1.11 Evaluation Awarenesshttps://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S4.SS1.SSS11Linked protocol

Apollo observed unusually high evaluation awareness. Follow-up behavioral impact was limited to a subset and did not inform hazardous-capability launch decisions; that does not prove no awareness effect.

References

  1. [1] Muse Spark Safety & Preparedness Report. 2026-05-14. 2026-08-24