WhitzardNUWA Lab ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

Search NUWA Index

Research · Benchmarks · Findings · Perspectives

中文
← NUWA Index

Evaluation dossier

HCAST

Uses human-calibrated software tasks to relate agent task completion to measured human effort.

Sources and provenance ↓ Read the research narrative →

Task and measurement

Benchmark protocol profile

Task / subject
Model or agent system under the original task configuration
Measurement target
Uses human-calibrated software tasks to relate agent task completion to measured human effort.
Interpretation boundary
Human effort calibration depends on the participant population, task distribution and agent configuration.
Measurement dossier · NUWA reading

Source-method reading and retained catalogue information are distinguished. Publication does not establish independent evidence or bilingual editorial review.

Measurement construct
Can human task duration ground autonomy capability measurement?
Task population
189 software, ML, cyber and reasoning tasks include 563 human attempts totaling over 1,500 hours, with manual task quality assurance.
Scoring and failure modes
Task success related to observed or forecast human time-to-complete.
System conditions
189 tasks and 563 human attempts; forecast-based times more common for longer tasks.
Statistical meaning
Source-reported result statements; this does not establish trial counts, denominators or an estimator: Agents succeeded 70–80% on sub-hour tasks and below 20% on tasks estimated above four hours. Some task-time estimates rely on forecasts rather than successful human attempts (§3.2).
Validity and interpretation
Long-task human baselines face selection and logistical biases; the tasks incompletely represent real work (§5).
Appropriate research use
Model recommendation: retain time-estimate source and task family when interpreting autonomy horizons.
  • HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks · AbstractSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2503.17354; sha256:74636576fcb11fa78c419dd47c2da316ac7d432a3ab57bff64b51cdf94a683a8; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks · §2 Benchmark Creation ProcessSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2503.17354; sha256:74636576fcb11fa78c419dd47c2da316ac7d432a3ab57bff64b51cdf94a683a8; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks · §3.2 Human Time EstimatesSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2503.17354; sha256:74636576fcb11fa78c419dd47c2da316ac7d432a3ab57bff64b51cdf94a683a8; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks · §5 DiscussionSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2503.17354; sha256:74636576fcb11fa78c419dd47c2da316ac7d432a3ab57bff64b51cdf94a683a8; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
Original source charts and materials
HCAST — Figure 6
Figure 6 · Original figure 6. Read alongside the protocol scope and limitations below. View original image ↗

Related research questions

References

  1. [1] David Rein, Joel Becker, et al.. HCAST: Human-Calibrated Autonomy Software Tasks. 2025-03-21. v1 [arXiv]; Author affiliations on the original paper title page; Figure 6