WhitzardNUWA Lab ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

Search NUWA Index

Research · Benchmarks · Findings · Perspectives

中文
← NUWA Index

Evaluation dossier

TheAgentCompany

How do agents complete consequential workplace tasks in a simulated company?

Sources and provenance ↓ Read the research narrative →

Task and measurement

Benchmark protocol profile

Task / subject
The model or agent in the stated task configuration.
Measurement target
Combines browsing, coding, file operations and interaction with simulated coworkers.
Interpretation boundary
Task success and evaluation-boundary behavior are separate outcomes; a broken environment is not an ordinary task failure.

Combines browsing, coding, file operations and interaction with simulated coworkers.

Measurement dossier · NUWA reading

Source-method reading and retained catalogue information are distinguished. Publication does not establish independent evidence or bilingual editorial review.

Measurement construct
Can agents perform diverse digital work in a simulated software company?
Task population
A self-contained environment supplies internal sites, files, tools and coworkers; checkpoints award partial credit with a substantial full-completion bonus.
Scoring and failure modes
Checkpoint partial credit plus 50% credit awarded only for full completion.
System conditions
Self-contained simulated company; feasibility-tested but no representative human baseline.
Statistical meaning
Source-reported result statements; this does not establish trial counts, denominators or an estimator: The scoring adds 50% credit only when every checkpoint is completed (§4.1).
Validity and interpretation
Simulated coworkers and sites restrict workplace realism; task feasibility checks do not establish human–agent productivity comparisons.
Appropriate research use
Model recommendation: report complete-task rate alongside partial score and avoid unsupported labor-substitution estimates.
  • TheAgentCompany · AbstractSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2412.14161; sha256:b5a66c55f2181c8ab279c5bd6ceb0f92badc66ae8378c0dc12dcedee6204b876; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • TheAgentCompany · §4.1 Evaluation MetricsSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2412.14161; sha256:b5a66c55f2181c8ab279c5bd6ceb0f92badc66ae8378c0dc12dcedee6204b876; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • TheAgentCompany · Appendix J LimitationSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2412.14161; sha256:b5a66c55f2181c8ab279c5bd6ceb0f92badc66ae8378c0dc12dcedee6204b876; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
Original source charts and materials

Read the original protocol ↗

Protocol scope is catalogued. Exact numerical extraction and an appropriate source figure remain to be reviewed.

Related research questions

References

  1. [1] TheAgentCompany. 2024-12-18