Evaluation dossier
TheAgentCompany
How do agents complete consequential workplace tasks in a simulated company?
Task and measurement
Benchmark protocol profile
- Task / subject
- The model or agent in the stated task configuration.
- Measurement target
- Combines browsing, coding, file operations and interaction with simulated coworkers.
- Interpretation boundary
- Task success and evaluation-boundary behavior are separate outcomes; a broken environment is not an ordinary task failure.
Combines browsing, coding, file operations and interaction with simulated coworkers.
Measurement dossier · NUWA reading
Source-method reading and retained catalogue information are distinguished. Publication does not establish independent evidence or bilingual editorial review.
- Measurement construct
- Can agents perform diverse digital work in a simulated software company?
- Task population
- A self-contained environment supplies internal sites, files, tools and coworkers; checkpoints award partial credit with a substantial full-completion bonus.
- Scoring and failure modes
- Checkpoint partial credit plus 50% credit awarded only for full completion.
- System conditions
- Self-contained simulated company; feasibility-tested but no representative human baseline.
- Statistical meaning
- Source-reported result statements; this does not establish trial counts, denominators or an estimator: The scoring adds 50% credit only when every checkpoint is completed (§4.1).
- Validity and interpretation
- Simulated coworkers and sites restrict workplace realism; task feasibility checks do not establish human–agent productivity comparisons.
- Appropriate research use
- Model recommendation: report complete-task rate alongside partial score and avoid unsupported labor-substitution estimates.
- TheAgentCompany · AbstractSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2412.14161; sha256:b5a66c55f2181c8ab279c5bd6ceb0f92badc66ae8378c0dc12dcedee6204b876; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
- TheAgentCompany · §4.1 Evaluation MetricsSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2412.14161; sha256:b5a66c55f2181c8ab279c5bd6ceb0f92badc66ae8378c0dc12dcedee6204b876; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
- TheAgentCompany · Appendix J LimitationSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2412.14161; sha256:b5a66c55f2181c8ab279c5bd6ceb0f92badc66ae8378c0dc12dcedee6204b876; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
Original source charts and materials
Protocol scope is catalogued. Exact numerical extraction and an appropriate source figure remain to be reviewed.
Related research questions
Autonomy / Sustained autonomous work →
The protocol explicitly measures this question or an enabling sub-capability; conclusions retain its stated conditions.
References
- [1] TheAgentCompany. 2024-12-18