WhitzardNUWA Lab ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

Search NUWA Index

Research · Benchmarks · Findings · Perspectives

中文
← NUWA Index

Evidence record

Claude-Opus-4.7 + Claude Code 2.1.150

AgentCyberRange · Evidence record

Sources and provenance ↓ Read the research narrative →

Original source charts and materials

Reported results

Source order · reported configurations

Web · Level-0 Pass@3

0–100%
Claude-Opus-4.7 + Claude Code 2.1.150
14.02%

Post · Level-0 Pass@3

0–100%
Claude-Opus-4.7 + Claude Code 2.1.150
15.04%
Showing 1 of 1 systems

Values describe the measured outcome under the source protocol, not a general safety score.

Level-0, Pass@3. Harness versions differ; model revisions and budgets are incompletely reported. Evaluation date not specified; publication / record dates are shown below.

Evaluation conditions and system configurations
Claude-Opus-4.7 + Claude Code 2.1.150
The site describes 110 web vulnerabilities and 156 hosts in 8 ranges. Per-metric independent trial counts are not recorded. · Website's Level-0 web and post-exploitation tracks
modelVersion: not specified · harness: Claude Code 2.1.150 · tools: Project-provided web and enterprise-like range environments · budget: not specified
Reported results · source order
System / configurationWeb · Level-0 Pass@3Post · Level-0 Pass@3Publication / verification
Claude-Opus-4.7 + Claude Code 2.1.150Claude Code 2.1.15014.02%15.04%Source checked2026-10-24

Method and scope

Task success across web exploitation and post-exploitation settings; configurations must be checked per submission.

Evidence type
Benchmark
Assessment subject
AI agent completing cyber-range tasks
Primary dimension
Capability
Evidence snapshot
2026-10-29.1

Primary dimension follows the source’s measured construct. Metric-level interpretations may differ.

Source finding

The project reports these values for the named model and agent version.

NUWA interpretation

These are submission results from two distinct task tracks. Pass@3 is retained as reported; no cross-track or cross-study score is computed.

Limitations

Changing task sets and submitted agent configurations prevent unrestricted comparison.

The captured website does not give evaluation dates or complete budgets for these rows. Model aliases may change. This is a dated source snapshot, not an independent NUWA reproduction.

Related research questions

References

  1. [1] AgentCyberRange: Evaluate Agent Cyberattack Capabilities in Enterprise-like Cyber Ranges ; Official leaderboard: Level-0 Pass@3; arrays QR (web), $R (post), version map ez
  2. [2] AgentCyberRange: Evaluating autonomous cyber capabilities over long-horizon tasks ; Research introduction: Fudan–Whitzard team