WhitzardNUWA Lab ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

Search NUWA Index

Research · Benchmarks · Findings · Perspectives

中文
← NUWA Index

Evidence record

CodeLlama-34b-Instruct-hf

Tensor Trust · Evidence record

Sources and provenance ↓ Read the research narrative →

Original source charts and materials

Recorded measurements

Defense validity
69.6%

Not disclosed

Harness not specified · Budget not specified

Method and scope

How robust are instruction-following models against human-created prompt extraction and hijacking?

Evidence type
Benchmark
Assessment subject
An online game supplies human attack/defense interactions; filtered subsets become separate extraction and hijacking benchmarks with explicit defense-validity checks.
Primary dimension
Behavior
Evidence snapshot
2026-10-29.1

Adversarial filtering and reference-model selection shape the test population. Game success uses a narrow string criterion; it is not equivalent to real application compromise.

Source finding

The study finds that apparently simple authorization instructions remain vulnerable and reports selected transfer demonstrations beyond the game.

Limitations

Adversarial filtering and reference-model selection shape the test population. Game success uses a narrow string criterion; it is not equivalent to real application compromise.

Adversarial filtering and reference-model selection shape the test population. Game success uses a narrow string criterion; it is not equivalent to real application compromise.

Related research questions

References

Numerical results are reported by the cited authors.

  1. [1] Tensor Trust: Interpretable Prompt Injection Attacks from an Online Game. 2023-11-02 ; #A3.T2; row CodeLlama-34b-Instruct-hf; column Defense validity; condition Extraction