Evidence record
DeepSeek v4 Pro
WMDP · Evidence record
Source snapshot, chart and review scope →
Original source charts and materials
Recorded measurements
- accuracy
- 86.2%
Source denominator: 1987 (unit not disclosed)
Harness not specified · Budget not specified
Assessment provenance
Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks → · External report
Actual evaluation: Neo Research · Model record →
Method and scope
Multiple-choice knowledge measurements.
- Evidence type
- Benchmark
- Assessment subject
- Model answering hazardous knowledge questions
- Primary dimension
- Capability
- Evidence snapshot
- 2026-10-29.1
Primary dimension follows the source’s measured construct. Metric-level interpretations may differ.
Source finding
accuracy: 86.2 percent. Conditions are retained from the source.
Limitations
Knowledge is a proxy; scores do not establish practical harmful-task ability.
Source transcription is not experimental replication. Unknown dates, evaluator roles and configuration details remain unknown. Source groups are not verified rankings.
Related research questions
CBRN / Hazardous knowledge →
The source directly measures the stated construct under its protocol.
References
- [1] Nathaniel Li ∗, Alexander Pan ∗, et al.. The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning. 2024-05-15. v7 [arXiv]; Author affiliations on the original paper title page
- [2] Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks. 2026-05-29. v1.1 · 29 May 2026 ; PDF p. 9; WMDP-Cyber; accuracy