WhitzardNUWA Lab ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

Search NUWA Index

Research · Benchmarks · Findings · Perspectives

中文
← Library

Risk Evaluation · Benchmark

AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents

NUWA research note · independent review pending

First published: Source checked: 2026-10-25
NUWA Research NoteResearch questionDesign and assumptionsSource findingsNUWA interpretationLimits and contrary evidenceResearch and decision relevanceInstitutions and rolesOriginal resources

Model-assisted reading · Selected sections of the original full text or official article; a complete section-by-section audit remains pending.

At a glance

NUWA interpretation: attack resistance must be interpreted alongside baseline ability and legitimate-task completion.

Research question

Can tool-using agents maintain utility while processing attacker-controlled external data?

Design and assumptions

An executable, stateful environment includes 97 user tasks and 629 security cases, pairing a user task with an adversarial objective.

Source findings

Agents fail some benign tasks even without attacks.

Utility under attack requires completing the legitimate task without adversarial side effects (§3.4), rather than merely refusing an injection.

NUWA interpretation

NUWA interpretation: attack resistance must be interpreted alongside baseline ability and legitimate-task completion.

Limits and contrary evidence

Tool isolation fails when tools cannot be planned in advance or legitimate tools suffice for the attack; ongoing multi-task contexts are incompletely covered.

Research and decision relevance

Model recommendation: report benign utility, utility under attack and targeted attack success separately.

Precise source locations

Source checking, extraction, editorial approval and replication are recorded separately. Methodology →

Institutions and roles

Authors (4)

Edoardo Debenedetti · Jie Zhang · Mislav Balunovic · Luca Beurer-Kellner   Marc Fischer   Florian Tramèr

Evaluation protocols

AgentDojo →

Cite and reuse

Cite the original publication for its findings. Cite this NUWA record separately for its explanation and retained snapshot.

Original publication · BibTeX
@misc{agentdojo,
  title = {AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/html/2406.13352v3},
  author = {Edoardo Debenedetti and Jie Zhang and Mislav Balunovic and Luca Beurer-Kellner   Marc Fischer   Florian Tramèr},
  year = {2024},
  date = {2024-11-24},
  version = {arXiv:2406.13352v3},
  note = {arXiv:2406.13352v3}
}
NUWA record · BibTeX
@misc{agentdojo-nuwa,
  title = {AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents — NUWA research record},
  url = {https://whitzard.tech/en/nuwa/whitzard-index/work/agentdojo/},
  version = {2026-10-29.1},
  organization = {NUWA Frontier AI Safety Lab},
  howpublished = {Retained note edition: https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/data/record-editions/2026-10-29.1--agentdojo.json},
  note = {NUWA research note. Source-reading scope and independent review status are stated on the record. Snapshot 2026-10-29.1. Retained note edition: https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/data/record-editions/2026-10-29.1--agentdojo.json.}
}

Evidence snapshot 2026-10-29.1 · Index updates · RSS

References

  1. [1] Edoardo Debenedetti, Jie Zhang, et al.. AgentDojo: A Dynamic Environment to Evaluate Prompt Injection Attacks and Defenses for LLM Agents. 2024-11-24. v3 ; Author affiliations on the original paper title page; Abstract; §3 Designing and Constructing AgentDojo