WhitzardNUWA Lab ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

Search NUWA Index

Research · Benchmarks · Findings · Perspectives

中文
← Library

Risk Evaluation · Technical report

Evaluation of DeepSeek AI Models

NUWA research note · independent review pending

First published: Source checked: 2026-10-25
NUWA Research NoteResearch questionDesign and assumptionsSource findingsNUWA interpretationLimits and contrary evidenceResearch and decision relevanceInstitutions and rolesOriginal resources

Model-assisted reading · Selected sections of the original full text or official article; a complete section-by-section audit remains pending.

At a glance

NUWA interpretation: independent benchmark selection and explicit budget conventions are essential to cross-provider interpretation.

Research question

How do selected DeepSeek releases compare on controlled capability and security evaluations?

Design and assumptions

The September 2025 report evaluates R1, R1-0528 and V3.1 with US reference models across nineteen public/private benchmarks, with agent interfaces adapted per model.

CyberGym — Figure 2
Figure 2 · Original result figure. Interpret within the protocol scope and limitations below. Original figure and source ↗

Source findings

The report finds the best US reference ahead of the best DeepSeek release on nearly every tested benchmark, with larger cyber/software gaps.

It separately studies capability, cost efficiency, security, censorship and adoption rather than treating them as one metric.

NUWA interpretation

NUWA interpretation: independent benchmark selection and explicit budget conventions are essential to cross-provider interpretation.

Limits and contrary evidence

These are dated releases and selected tasks; cost efficiency uses an expense–performance method, not token prices alone, and uncertainty labels include standard errors.

Research and decision relevance

Model recommendation: cite benchmark-specific budgets, model releases and uncertainty units; do not convert national comparisons into an undated global ranking.

Precise source locations
  • Evaluation of DeepSeek AI Models · PDF p.2 §1 Executive SummarySelected original resource https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf; sha256:4b267893d3c4b6b48d36deb99efec591c414d2e2608be0625d90b477298c82af; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • Evaluation of DeepSeek AI Models · PDF pp.4–5 §2 MethodologySelected original resource https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf; sha256:4b267893d3c4b6b48d36deb99efec591c414d2e2608be0625d90b477298c82af; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • Evaluation of DeepSeek AI Models · PDF p.63 Appendix: agent configurationSelected original resource https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf; sha256:4b267893d3c4b6b48d36deb99efec591c414d2e2608be0625d90b477298c82af; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • Evaluation of DeepSeek AI Models · PDF p.66 A5 Model Token Prices and A6 Cost Ratio CalculationSelected original resource https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf; sha256:4b267893d3c4b6b48d36deb99efec591c414d2e2608be0625d90b477298c82af; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established

Source checking, extraction, editorial approval and replication are recorded separately. Methodology →

Institutions and roles

Evaluation protocols

Cybench →

CyberGym →

AgentDojo →

Cite and reuse

Cite the original publication for its findings. Cite this NUWA record separately for its explanation and retained snapshot.

Original publication · BibTeX
@misc{caisi-deepseek-2025-report,
  title = {Evaluation of DeepSeek AI Models},
  url = {https://www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2025/09/30/CAISI_Evaluation_of_DeepSeek_AI_Models.pdf},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-30},
  version = {30 September 2025},
  note = {30 September 2025}
}
NUWA record · BibTeX
@misc{caisi-deepseek-2025-report-nuwa,
  title = {Evaluation of DeepSeek AI Models — NUWA research record},
  url = {https://whitzard.tech/en/nuwa/whitzard-index/work/caisi-deepseek-2025-report/},
  version = {2026-10-29.1},
  organization = {NUWA Frontier AI Safety Lab},
  howpublished = {Retained note edition: https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/data/record-editions/2026-10-29.1--caisi-deepseek-2025-report.json},
  note = {NUWA research note. Source-reading scope and independent review status are stated on the record. Snapshot 2026-10-29.1. Retained note edition: https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/data/record-editions/2026-10-29.1--caisi-deepseek-2025-report.json.}
}

Evidence snapshot 2026-10-29.1 · Index updates · RSS

References

  1. [1] Evaluation of DeepSeek AI Models. 2025-09-30. 30 September 2025 ; Report masthead and stated evaluation methodology; PDF p.2 §1 Executive Summary; PDF pp.4–5 §2 Methodology