RESEARCH RECORD
Resolution Diagnostics for Paired LLM Evaluation
Original publication ↗ · BibTeX · RISSome displayed model gaps remain unresolved under the specified error and power targets; sample size alone is insufficient without paired variance and dependence assumptions.
Research question
Can the available benchmark sample resolve a reported model-performance gap?
Design & assumptions
The analysis inverts paired tests into required sample sizes and examines real per-question leaderboard data with clustering and multiplicity checks.
Findings
Some displayed model gaps remain unresolved under the specified error and power targets; sample size alone is insufficient without paired variance and dependence assumptions.
Limits & counterevidence
The empirical evidence is primarily binary accuracy and close comparisons. It does not show that all rankings are meaningless, nor does a non-significant gap prove equivalence.
Source evidence
No structured numerical extraction is available in this reading package.
Reading scope & review
Selected original HTML sections and table context; not a complete paper/appendix audit or independent reproduction.
Model-assisted reading; independent evidence review pending.
Check the original source ↗