WhitzardNUWA Lab ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

Search NUWA Index

Research · Benchmarks · Findings · Perspectives

中文
← Library

Risk Evaluation · Benchmark

SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks

NUWA research note · independent review pending

First published: Source checked: 2026-10-25
NUWA Research NoteResearch questionDesign and assumptionsSource findingsNUWA interpretationLimits and contrary evidenceResearch and decision relevanceInstitutions and rolesOriginal resources

Model-assisted reading · Selected sections of the original full text or official article; a complete section-by-section audit remains pending.

At a glance

NUWA interpretation: reproduction and repair are separate tasks with different information affordances.

Research question

Can security-agent datasets be built with reproducible vulnerability and patch checks?

Design and assumptions

An automated pipeline reconstructs C/C++ projects, verifies memory-safety defects and evaluates PoC generation and patching with multiple coding scaffolds.

SEC-bench — Figure 1
Figure 1 · Original figure 1. Read alongside the protocol scope and limitations below. Original figure and source ↗

Source findings

The reported best success rates were 18.0% for PoC generation and 34.0% for patching on the complete dataset.

Patch tasks provide vulnerable locations, whereas PoC tasks require more exploration.

NUWA interpretation

NUWA interpretation: reproduction and repair are separate tasks with different information affordances.

Limits and contrary evidence

Sanitizer-detectable memory-safety defects and C/C++ coverage exclude many web, kernel and distributed-system failure classes (§5).

Research and decision relevance

Model recommendation: retain task type and provided location information; do not equate sanitizer reproduction with exploit impact.

Precise source locations

Source checking, extraction, editorial approval and replication are recorded separately. Methodology →

Institutions and roles

Authors (4)

Hwiwon Lee · Ziqi Zhang · Hanxiao Lu · Lingming Zhang

Evaluation protocols

SEC-bench →

Cite and reuse

Cite the original publication for its findings. Cite this NUWA record separately for its explanation and retained snapshot.

Original publication · BibTeX
@misc{sec-bench,
  title = {SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11791},
  author = {Hwiwon Lee and Ziqi Zhang and Hanxiao Lu and Lingming Zhang},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-06-13},
  version = {arXiv:2506.11791v2},
  note = {arXiv:2506.11791v2}
}
NUWA record · BibTeX
@misc{sec-bench-nuwa,
  title = {SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks — NUWA research record},
  url = {https://whitzard.tech/en/nuwa/whitzard-index/work/sec-bench/},
  version = {2026-10-29.1},
  organization = {NUWA Frontier AI Safety Lab},
  howpublished = {Retained note edition: https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/data/record-editions/2026-10-29.1--sec-bench.json},
  note = {NUWA research note. Source-reading scope and independent review status are stated on the record. Snapshot 2026-10-29.1. Retained note edition: https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/data/record-editions/2026-10-29.1--sec-bench.json.}
}

Evidence snapshot 2026-10-29.1 · Index updates · RSS

References

  1. [1] Hwiwon Lee  Ziqi Zhang  Hanxiao Lu † Lingming Zhang. SEC-bench: Automated Benchmarking of LLM Agents on Real-World Software Security Tasks. 2025-06-13. v2 [arXiv]; Author affiliations on the original paper title page; Abstract; §3.1 Experimental Setup