白泽(Whitzard)女娲实验室 ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

搜索 NUWA Index

研究 · 测量协议 · 评测结果 · 观点

English
← 研究目录

风险评测 · 技术报告

Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks

NUWA 研究解读 · 独立复核待完成

首次发表: 来源核验: 2026-10-25
NUWA Research Note研究问题研究设计与假设来源发现NUWA 解读局限与相反证据研究与决策意义机构与角色原始资源

模型辅助整理 · 选读原始全文或官方文章中的相关章节;尚未完成逐章节审计。

研究速读

NUWA 解读:攻击稳健性和量表依赖判官差异使单一安全排序复杂化。

研究问题

对抗激励或不同安全判官下DeepSeek V4 Pro发生什么变化?

研究设计与假设

无特权访问,使用公开权重API测四风险领域,并补充提示行为、自动审计及判官敏感性。

Agentic misalignment — Source figure
Source figure · 原文 Source figure。请结合下方的协议范围与局限阅读。 原图与来源 ↗

来源发现

所报StrongREJECT在一种攻击条件从0.6%变77.8%。

二元安全判官较相似,Petri序数关切均值按组为4.08与2.97。

NUWA 解读

NUWA 解读:攻击稳健性和量表依赖判官差异使单一安全排序复杂化。

局限与相反证据

公共基准不确立整体风险,诱导行为不同于自发谋划,判官组也非可互换测量工具。

研究与决策意义

模型建议:保留访问、诱导和判分量表,不提取操作性CBRN内容。

精确来源位置
  • Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks · Executive summarySelected original resource https://neoresearch.ai/research/deepseek-v4-pro-safety-evaluation/; sha256:43dd23e7277661bc2c9363bbfff561dcc56dbfbfed45519dadb5fb6e1e71ab33; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks · §4 Loss of controlSelected original resource https://neoresearch.ai/research/deepseek-v4-pro-safety-evaluation/; sha256:43dd23e7277661bc2c9363bbfff561dcc56dbfbfed45519dadb5fb6e1e71ab33; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks · §5 Adversarial robustnessSelected original resource https://neoresearch.ai/research/deepseek-v4-pro-safety-evaluation/; sha256:43dd23e7277661bc2c9363bbfff561dcc56dbfbfed45519dadb5fb6e1e71ab33; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks · §7 Testing whether judge origin affects safety scoringSelected original resource https://neoresearch.ai/research/deepseek-v4-pro-safety-evaluation/; sha256:43dd23e7277661bc2c9363bbfff561dcc56dbfbfed45519dadb5fb6e1e71ab33; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
  • Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks · §8 ConclusionSelected original resource https://neoresearch.ai/research/deepseek-v4-pro-safety-evaluation/; sha256:43dd23e7277661bc2c9363bbfff561dcc56dbfbfed45519dadb5fb6e1e71ab33; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established

来源核查、数据提取、编辑批准与实验复现分别记录。 方法说明 →

机构与角色

评测协议

Cybench →

EVMbench →

WMDP →

LAB-Bench →

MASK →

DeceptionBench →

Attempt to Persuade Eval (APE) →

PersuSafety →

Alignment faking →

Agentic misalignment →

Shutdown resistance in reasoning models →

ImpossibleBench →

FORTRESS →

Petri →

引用与复用

引用研究发现时请引用原始出版物;引用 NUWA 的整理与解释时,单独引用本站记录及对应快照。

原始出版物 · BibTeX
@misc{neo-deepseek-v4-report,
  title = {Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks},
  url = {https://neoresearch.ai/papers/DSv4_Safety_Evaluation_v1.1.pdf},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-29},
  version = {v1.1 · 29 May 2026},
  note = {v1.1 · 29 May 2026}
}
NUWA 记录 · BibTeX
@misc{neo-deepseek-v4-report-nuwa,
  title = {Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks — NUWA research record},
  url = {https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/work/neo-deepseek-v4-report/},
  version = {2026-10-29.1},
  organization = {NUWA Frontier AI Safety Lab},
  howpublished = {Retained note edition: https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/data/record-editions/2026-10-29.1--neo-deepseek-v4-report.json},
  note = {NUWA research note. Source-reading scope and independent review status are stated on the record. Snapshot 2026-10-29.1. Retained note edition: https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/data/record-editions/2026-10-29.1--neo-deepseek-v4-report.json.}
}

证据快照 2026-10-29.1 · 索引更新 · RSS

参考文献

  1. [1] Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks. 2026-05-29. v1.1 · 29 May 2026 ; Report masthead and stated evaluation methodology; Executive summary; §4 Loss of control