DeceptionBench

Source-method reading and retained catalogue information are distinguished. Publication does not establish independent evidence or bilingual editorial review.

Measurement construct

How do role framing, reward and pressure affect deceptive responses across social domains?

Task population

150 scenarios span five domains and fifteen deception types, with single-/multi-turn variants and self-/other-oriented roles.

Scoring and failure modes

Condition-specific deceptive-response rate, preserving L1/L2/L3 and single-/multi-turn distinctions.

System conditions

150 scenarios, five domains, fifteen types, role/reward/pressure variants.

Statistical meaning

Source-reported result statements; this does not establish trial counts, denominators or an estimator: Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct’s reported deception rate rose from 31.33% in L1 to 86.91% under multi-turn pressure and 82.89% under reward.

Validity and interpretation

Language-only constructed scenarios and automated labels do not prove real beliefs or real-world deception prevalence.

Appropriate research use

Model recommendation: preserve inducement level, role and turn structure with every rate.

• DeceptionBench · §2.2.3 Dataset Structure and Prompt DesignSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2510.15501; sha256:cc8d41bf5e94e6d6b4527d51ec3e928214bf154e2b5be5878bc036df4f3c1862; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
• DeceptionBench · §3 Analysis on Experimental Results: Effect of Extrinsic FactorsSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2510.15501; sha256:cc8d41bf5e94e6d6b4527d51ec3e928214bf154e2b5be5878bc036df4f3c1862; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
• DeceptionBench · §4 Discussion and LimitationsSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2510.15501; sha256:cc8d41bf5e94e6d6b4527d51ec3e928214bf154e2b5be5878bc036df4f3c1862; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established