Risk Evaluation · Benchmark
BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems
NUWA research note · independent review pending
NUWA Research Note
Research questionDesign and assumptionsSource findingsNUWA interpretationLimits and contrary evidenceResearch and decision relevanceInstitutions and rolesOriginal resourcesModel-assisted reading · Selected sections of the original full text or official article; a complete section-by-section audit remains pending.
At a glance
NUWA interpretation: task information and success checks create different capability measurements.
Research question
Can one framework distinguish detection, exploitation and patching across real applications?
Design and assumptions
25 manually configured systems contain forty paid-bounty vulnerabilities; task variants change the information provided and score detect/exploit/patch separately.
Source findings
With up to three attempts, top reported scores included 12.5% Detect, 67.5% Exploit and 90% Patch from different agent setups.
These do not form a single model’s lifecycle completion rate.
NUWA interpretation
NUWA interpretation: task information and success checks create different capability measurements.
Limits and contrary evidence
Added-vulnerability coverage and incomplete invariants can miss new defects or incomplete patches; environment preparation is heavily manual.
Research and decision relevance
Model recommendation: keep task-specific agents, attempts and validation coverage instead of aggregating into one cyber score.
Precise source locations
- BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems · AbstractSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2505.15216; sha256:20b337b2f78d1ea058b3ca071004daead3ff8f1bb4b8f84fdbfbbdd74256ab52; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
- BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems · §4 ExperimentsSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2505.15216; sha256:20b337b2f78d1ea058b3ca071004daead3ff8f1bb4b8f84fdbfbbdd74256ab52; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
- BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems · §6 DiscussionSelected original resource https://arxiv.org/html/2505.15216; sha256:20b337b2f78d1ea058b3ca071004daead3ff8f1bb4b8f84fdbfbbdd74256ab52; archived source capture; exact capture time not independently established
Source checking, extraction, editorial approval and replication are recorded separately. Methodology →
Institutions and roles
Authors (34)
Andy K. Zhang · Joey Ji · Celeste Menders · Riya Dulepet · Thomas Qin · Ron Y. Wang · Junrong Wu · Kyleen Liao · Jiliang Li · Jinghan Hu · Sara Hong · Nardos Demilew · Shivatmica Murgai · Jason Tran · Nishka Kacheria · Ethan Ho · Denis Liu · Lauren McLane · Olivia Bruvik · Dai-Rong Han · Seungwoo Kim · Akhil Vyas · Cuiyuanxiu Chen · Ryan Li · Weiran Xu · Jonathan Z. Ye · Prerit Choudhary · Siddharth M. Bhatia · Vikram Sivashankar · Yuxuan Bao · Dawn Song · Dan Boneh · Daniel E. Ho · Percy Liang
Evaluation protocols
Cite and reuse
Cite the original publication for its findings. Cite this NUWA record separately for its explanation and retained snapshot.
Original publication · BibTeX
@misc{bountybench,
title = {BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15216},
author = {Andy K. Zhang and Joey Ji and Celeste Menders and Riya Dulepet and Thomas Qin and Ron Y. Wang and Junrong Wu and Kyleen Liao and Jiliang Li and Jinghan Hu and Sara Hong and Nardos Demilew and Shivatmica Murgai and Jason Tran and Nishka Kacheria and Ethan Ho and Denis Liu and Lauren McLane and Olivia Bruvik and Dai-Rong Han and Seungwoo Kim and Akhil Vyas and Cuiyuanxiu Chen and Ryan Li and Weiran Xu and Jonathan Z. Ye and Prerit Choudhary and Siddharth M. Bhatia and Vikram Sivashankar and Yuxuan Bao and Dawn Song and Dan Boneh and Daniel E. Ho and Percy Liang},
year = {2025},
date = {2025-05-21},
version = {arXiv:2505.15216v3},
note = {arXiv:2505.15216v3}
}
NUWA record · BibTeX
@misc{bountybench-nuwa,
title = {BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems — NUWA research record},
url = {https://whitzard.tech/en/nuwa/whitzard-index/work/bountybench/},
version = {2026-10-29.1},
organization = {NUWA Frontier AI Safety Lab},
howpublished = {Retained note edition: https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/data/record-editions/2026-10-29.1--bountybench.json},
note = {NUWA research note. Source-reading scope and independent review status are stated on the record. Snapshot 2026-10-29.1. Retained note edition: https://whitzard.tech/nuwa/whitzard-index/data/record-editions/2026-10-29.1--bountybench.json.}
}
Evidence snapshot 2026-10-29.1 · Index updates · RSS
References
- [1] Andy K. Zhang, Joey Ji, et al.. BountyBench: Dollar Impact of AI Agent Attackers and Defenders on Real-World Cybersecurity Systems. 2025-05-21. v3 [arXiv]; Author affiliations on the original paper title page; Abstract; §4 Experiments