Institution
Stanford UniversityRoles and affiliations follow the cited source. A source check is not an independent replication.
More filters →QuestionCan one framework distinguish detection, exploitation and patching across real applications?
Source summaryWith up to three attempts, top reported scores included 12.5% Detect, 67.5% Exploit and 90% Patch from different agent setups.
NUWA research note · independent review pending
QuestionHow capable are language-model agents at multi-step security tasks, and which steps remain difficult when intermediate goals are supplied?
Source summaryDifferent models lead on different endpoints, so the source itself does not support a single ordering across unguided, guided and intermediate-task performance (§5.1).
NUWA research note · independent review pending · Contains: question / method / limits
Center for AI Safety
University of California, Berkeley
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
SecureBio
Scale AI
New York University
IIIT HyderabadStanford University
Harvard University
University of Southern California
University of Illinois Urbana-ChampaignLapis Labs
University of California, Los Angeles
California Institute of TechnologySybil
Northeastern University
Carnegie Mellon University
RTX BBN Technologies
University of Newcastle
Keio University
Ariel University
Arizona State University
xAI
QuestionCan a public proxy benchmark track hazardous knowledge while supporting mitigation research?
Source summaryThe paper evaluates knowledge-reduction methods alongside general-capability retention.
NUWA research note · independent review pending · Contains: question / method / limits
NUWA