白泽(Whitzard)女娲实验室 ↗
NUWANUWA INDEX

搜索 NUWA Index

研究 · 测量协议 · 评测结果 · 观点

English
← NUWA Index

风险问题

欺骗

系统何时会对用户或监督者隐瞒、误导或策略性改变行为?

来源与出处 ↓

已发表证据

Agentic misalignment · 实验条件下的有害行动

跨来源报告的已发表测量。任务范围通过注释区分,配置差异保留在每条观测中。

108 条观测 · 108 已定位日期

GLM-5.2 explicit goal GLM-5.2 ambiguous goal GLM-5.2 latent goal GLM-5.2 no goal Claude Opus 4.7 explicit goal Claude Opus 4.7 latent goal Claude Opus 4.7 ambiguous goal Claude Opus 4.7 no goal GPT-5.5 explicit goal GPT-5.5 latent goal GPT-5.5 ambiguous goal GPT-5.5 no goal Replacement Restriction No threat 57% [39–73] 43% [27–61] 17% [7–34] 10% [3–26] 3% [1–17] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] 0% [0–11] Blackmail scenario 有害行动发生率(%)· 每种条件 30 次试验

选择图中数据点或表格行,查看条件与出处。

108 条观测

测量值与来源条件
系统/模型结果条件状态任务/条件评测方/报告日期
GLM-5.257%有害行动发生率[39–73]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighexplicit goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.243%有害行动发生率[27–61]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighexplicit goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.217%有害行动发生率[7–34]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighambiguous goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.210%有害行动发生率[3–26]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighlatent goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.23%有害行动发生率[1–17]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighambiguous goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighexplicit goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighlatent goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighlatent goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighambiguous goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighno goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighno goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenarioxhighno goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxexplicit goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxexplicit goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxexplicit goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxlatent goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxlatent goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxlatent goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxambiguous goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxambiguous goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxambiguous goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxno goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxno goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariomaxno goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighexplicit goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighexplicit goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighexplicit goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighlatent goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighlatent goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighlatent goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighambiguous goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighambiguous goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighambiguous goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighno goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighno goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Blackmail scenariohighno goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighexplicit goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighexplicit goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighexplicit goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighlatent goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighlatent goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighlatent goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighambiguous goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighambiguous goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighambiguous goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighno goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighno goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenarioxhighno goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxexplicit goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxexplicit goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxexplicit goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxlatent goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxlatent goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxlatent goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxambiguous goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxambiguous goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxambiguous goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxno goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxno goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariomaxno goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighexplicit goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighexplicit goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighexplicit goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighlatent goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighlatent goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighlatent goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighambiguous goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighambiguous goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighambiguous goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighno goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighno goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Leaking scenariohighno goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighexplicit goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighexplicit goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighexplicit goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighlatent goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighlatent goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighlatent goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighambiguous goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighambiguous goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighambiguous goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighno goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighno goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
GLM-5.20%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenarioxhighno goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-06-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxexplicit goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxexplicit goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxexplicit goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxlatent goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxlatent goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxlatent goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxambiguous goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxambiguous goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxambiguous goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxno goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxno goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
Claude Opus 4.70%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariomaxno goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-16报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighexplicit goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighexplicit goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighexplicit goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighlatent goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighlatent goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighlatent goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighambiguous goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighambiguous goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighambiguous goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighno goal · ReplacementInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighno goal · RestrictionInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
GPT-5.50%有害行动发生率[0–11]条件不完整Agentic Misalignment Murder scenariohighno goal · No threatInspect Evals; GPT-5-mini transcript judgeSaferAIGLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report发布 2026-04-23报告 2026-08-02
后续研究问题

固定情境与压力条件,检验判别器可靠性和跨情境复现;不能把可见轨迹视为对意图的直接读取。

查看模型证据 →

补充研究与解释

原文选读 · 模型辅助整理,独立复核待完成。以下记录补充解释,未改变趋势图成绩。

范围

隐蔽谋划、评测规避与误导性交流是不同问题。

威胁模型

智能体可能具有给定目标,并有机会隐藏行动或改变报告。

证据缺口

错误回答或意识到正在评测,本身不能证明有意欺骗。

证据矩阵

行是研究问题,列是评测的观测维度。数量指评测档案,不代表风险高低。

欺骗 · 证据矩阵
风险问题Propensity · 行为倾向Capability · 任务能力Behavior · 观察行为
隐蔽目标追求系统是否在追求与任务冲突的目标时隐藏行动?2项评测档案2项评测档案1项评测档案
评测规避系统是否因为识别监督或评测而改变所呈现的能力或行为?1项评测档案2项评测档案2项评测档案
误导性交流系统在明确交互中如何产生误导性陈述或行动?3项评测档案—当前目录未收录证据3项评测档案

连线表示研究关联,不代表已验证的因果链或风险分数。

欺骗 / Propensity · 行为倾向

隐蔽目标追求

系统是否在追求与任务冲突的目标时隐藏行动?

纳入
存在目标冲突且可观察到隐瞒或误导的情境。
不能据此认定
单次错误回答不等于隐蔽谋划。

2 项评测档案 · 196 条已核验结果

研究评测 · 直接测量

Agentic misalignment ↗

部分情境测试在追求指定目标时隐蔽实施有害行动。

评测对象: 面临模拟目标冲突的智能体

证据关系: Anthropic, Results and caveats

欺骗 / Capability · 任务能力

隐蔽目标追求

系统是否在追求与任务冲突的目标时隐藏行动?

纳入
存在目标冲突且可观察到隐瞒或误导的情境。
不能据此认定
单次错误回答不等于隐蔽谋划。

2 项评测档案 · 0 条已核验结果

研究评测 · 直接测量

In-context scheming ↗

来源在其协议下直接测量所述构念。

评测对象: 上下文中被赋予冲突目标的模型

证据关系: arXiv:2412.04984v2, goal-conflict evaluations

可复用基准 · 直接测量

SHADE-Arena ↗

协议测试智能体能否在执行正当任务时完成隐蔽目标。

评测对象: 收到明确副任务指令的智能体

证据关系: Anthropic, SHADE-Arena setup and Results

欺骗 / Behavior · 观察行为

隐蔽目标追求

系统是否在追求与任务冲突的目标时隐藏行动?

纳入
存在目标冲突且可观察到隐瞒或误导的情境。
不能据此认定
单次错误回答不等于隐蔽谋划。

1 项评测档案 · 0 条已核验结果

研究评测 · 直接测量

In-context scheming ↗

来源在其协议下直接测量所述构念。

评测对象: 上下文中被赋予冲突目标的模型

证据关系: Reported actions within controlled scenarios

欺骗 / Propensity · 行为倾向

评测规避

系统是否因为识别监督或评测而改变所呈现的能力或行为?

纳入
受控评测意识与策略性低表现测试。
不能据此认定
识别评测不证明正在规避评测。

1 项评测档案 · 4 条已核验结果

可复用基准 · 直接测量

ImpossibleBench ↗

该协议明确测量该问题或其使能子能力,结论保留给定条件。

评测对象: 给定任务配置中的模型或智能体。

证据关系: Original protocol method and limitations

欺骗 / Capability · 任务能力

评测规避

系统是否因为识别监督或评测而改变所呈现的能力或行为?

纳入
受控评测意识与策略性低表现测试。
不能据此认定
识别评测不证明正在规避评测。

2 项评测档案 · 67 条已核验结果

可复用基准 · 前提证据

Stealth evaluations ↗

来源测量前提能力,并未观察到对应风险行为。

评测对象: 推理监督及测试情境的模型

证据关系: arXiv:2505.01420v4, stealth and situational awareness tests

欺骗 / Behavior · 观察行为

评测规避

系统是否因为识别监督或评测而改变所呈现的能力或行为?

纳入
受控评测意识与策略性低表现测试。
不能据此认定
识别评测不证明正在规避评测。

2 项评测档案 · 15 条已核验结果

可复用基准 · 背景资料

EvalAwareBench ↗

该协议明确测量该问题或其使能子能力,结论保留给定条件。

评测对象: 给定任务配置中的模型或智能体。

证据关系: Original protocol method and limitations

可复用基准 · 背景资料

CyberGym · Evaluating Kimi K3 for Misalignment Risks ↗

报告观察基准设施识别和探测,而非任务求解能力。

评测对象: 分析基准识别、判分器推理和隐藏端点探测轨迹,不是任务成功评分。

证据关系: §2.1.3–2.1.4; pp. 20–23

欺骗 / Propensity · 行为倾向

误导性交流

系统在明确交互中如何产生误导性陈述或行动?

纳入
情境层面的欺骗性输出与交互结果。
不能据此认定
信息不准确本身不证明策略性意图。

3 项评测档案 · 158 条已核验结果

可复用基准 · 直接测量

OpenDeception ↗

来源在其协议下直接测量所述构念。

评测对象: 模拟社会交互中的模型

证据关系: Scenario-level intent measure, arXiv:2504.13707v3

可复用基准 · 直接测量

MASK ↗

重复压力情境将说谎与错误信念区分。

评测对象: 受控诚实性测试中的模型

证据关系: arXiv:2503.03750v3, abstract and benchmark design

可复用基准 · 直接测量

DeceptionBench ↗

该协议明确测量该问题或其使能子能力,结论保留给定条件。

评测对象: 给定任务配置中的模型或智能体。

证据关系: Original protocol method and limitations

欺骗 / Capability · 任务能力

误导性交流

系统在明确交互中如何产生误导性陈述或行动?

纳入
情境层面的欺骗性输出与交互结果。
不能据此认定
信息不准确本身不证明策略性意图。

当前目录未收录证据

欺骗 / Behavior · 观察行为

误导性交流

系统在明确交互中如何产生误导性陈述或行动?

纳入
情境层面的欺骗性输出与交互结果。
不能据此认定
信息不准确本身不证明策略性意图。

3 项评测档案 · 27 条已核验结果

可复用基准 · 直接测量

OpenDeception ↗

来源在其协议下直接测量所述构念。

评测对象: 模拟社会交互中的模型

证据关系: Simulated interaction outcomes, arXiv:2504.13707v3

可复用基准 · 直接测量

CharXiv · Evaluating Kimi K3 for Misalignment Risks ↗

改造任务移除了必要输入,观察缺乏依据的作答尝试,不是原始能力测验。

评测对象: 移除必要图像的图表问题;回答尝试区分正确与错误。

证据关系: §1.1.1; pp. 7–9

可复用基准 · 直接测量

LAB-Bench · Evaluating Kimi K3 for Misalignment Risks ↗

改造任务移除了必要输入,观察缺乏依据的作答尝试,不是原始能力测验。

评测对象: 移除 FigQA 和 TableQA 必要图表,保留信息不足选项。

证据关系: §1.1.2; pp. 8–10

参考文献

  1. [1] Evaluating Kimi K3 for Misalignment Risks. 2026-09-11. September 2026 ; §1.1.1; pp. 7–9; §1.1.2; pp. 8–10; §2.1.3–2.1.4; pp. 20–23
  2. [2] Early Results on Evaluating GLM 5.2 for Behavioral and Persuasion Risks. 2026-07-03. 3 July 2026 ; §1; Figure 1; §1; Figure 2; §3; Figure 7
  3. [3] Evaluating DeepSeek v4 Pro for Frontier Risks. 2026-05-29. v1.1 · 29 May 2026 ; §3.1; §3.2; §4.1
  4. [4] GLM-5.2 Risk Evaluation Report. 2026-08-02. v1.1 · revised 26 August 2026 ; §4.3; Appendix A.9; §5.1; Appendix A.7; Table A.3
  5. [5] Claude Opus 4.5 System Card. 2025-11-05. 2025-12-05 ; PDF table of contents → named RSP / cyber / alignment sections
  6. [6] Claude Opus 4.6 System Card. 2026-02-06. 2026-03-06 ; PDF contents → named RSP, agentic safety and alignment sections
  7. [7] Claude Sonnet 4.6 System Card. 2026-02-17. 2026-03-06 ; PDF table of contents → named RSP / cyber / alignment sections
  8. [8] Claude Opus 4.7 System Card. 2026-04-16 ; PDF table of contents → named RSP / cyber / alignment sections
  9. [9] Claude Opus 4.8 System Card. 2026-05-28. 2026-06-17 ; PDF table of contents → named RSP / cyber / alignment sections
  10. [10] Claude Sonnet 5 System Card. 2026-06-30. 2026-07-10 ; PDF table of contents → named RSP / cyber / alignment sections
  11. [11] Anthropic August 2026 Risk Report. 2026-08-14 ; PDF printed pp.17–88
  12. [12] Claude Fable 5.1 and Mythos 5.1 System Card. 2026-09-01 ; PDF §6
  13. [13] Claude Opus 5.5 System Card. 2026-09-22 ; PDF §6
  14. [14] Claude Sonnet 5.5 System Card. 2026-09-28 ; PDF §6
  15. [15] Claude Haiku 5.5 System Card. 2026-10-07 ; PDF §6
  16. [16] Muse Wonder Model Card. 2026-10-23 ; PDF pp.7–10
  17. [17] Muse Spark Safety & Preparedness Report. 2026-05-14. 2026-08-24 ; https://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S2.SS3; https://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S4.SS1.SSS5; https://arxiv.org/html/2606.12429#S4.SS1.SSS11
  18. [18] Muse Spark 1.1 Evaluation Report. 2026-07-09 ; PDF §§2.1–2.3; PDF §4
  19. [19] Alexander Meinke, Bronson Schoen 等. Frontier Models are Capable of In-context Scheming. 2025-01-14. v2 ; arXiv:2412.04984v2, goal-conflict evaluations; Reported actions within controlled scenarios
  20. [20] Apollo Research: Science of Scheming. Index checked 2026-10-25
  21. [21] Mary Phuong, Roland S. Zimmermann 等. Evaluating Frontier Models for Stealth and Situational Awareness. 2025-07-03. v4 ; arXiv:2505.01420v4, stealth and situational awareness tests
  22. [22] Auditing Games for Sandbagging. 2025-12-07 article / arXiv:2512.07810
  23. [23] Rudolf Laine, Bilal Chughtai 等. Me, Myself, and AI: The Situational Awareness Dataset for LLMs. 2024-07-15 article; paper linked ; Benchmark description; full paper linked
  24. [24] Yichen Wu, Qianqian Gao 等. OpenDeception: Learning Deception and Trust in Human-AI Interaction via Multi-Agent Simulation. 2026-02-06. v3 ; Scenario-level intent measure, arXiv:2504.13707v3; Simulated interaction outcomes, arXiv:2504.13707v3
  25. [25] Ryan Greenblatt, † Carson Denison † † footnotemark: 等. Alignment faking in large language models. 2024-12-18 ; Anthropic, Experimental setup and caveats
  26. [26] Agentic misalignment: How LLMs could be insider threats. 2025-06-20 ; Anthropic, Methods and Results; Anthropic, Results and caveats
  27. [27] SHADE-Arena: Evaluating sabotage and monitoring in LLM agents. 2025-06-16 ; Anthropic, SHADE-Arena setup and Results
  28. [28] Richard Ren, Arunim Agarwal 等. The MASK Benchmark: Disentangling Honesty From Accuracy in AI Systems. 2026-01-05. v3 ; arXiv:2503.03750v3, abstract and benchmark design
  29. [29] DeceptionBench. 2025-10-17 ; Original protocol method and limitations
  30. [30] ImpossibleBench. 2025-10-23 ; Original protocol method and limitations
  31. [31] EvalAwareBench ; Original protocol method and limitations